Lately, I’ve noticed that there are more and more “writers” in the world.
Everywhere I go – parties, conferences, Starbucks – I overhear people talking about the book, the screenplay, the article, the short story or the blog post they are working on right now. They lament that they wish they had more time to write. They fantasize about being a “writer”, as if being a writer involved anything more than writing regularly. They talk about the “reader” that they want to attract.
I don’t know what the real reason is for all these new “writers” that seem to be emerging right now. Is it the blogosphere with its promise of instant readership and the illusion that everyone has a “unique voice” or has something to say – no matter how trivial? Are current economic woes producing a common dream of being what we are not? Is it a collective mid-life crisis?
Not so long ago, back when I was still in college, I remember all my friends and family admonishing me for switching to Journalism as my major, with English Lit as my minor.
“What are you going to do with that degree?” my uncle asked me. “Not everyone gets to write for the New York Times, you know.”
My aunt sighed and said, “I suppose you can work in marketing or public relations.”
“Just promise me,” one of my successful friends from high school said to me one day when I was visiting him at MIT, “that you won’t become a dreamy, bohemian gypsy.”
In other words, deciding to become a writer was not considered a good life choice. Neither was deciding to become a singer, or an actor, or an artist. Now, suddenly, everyone is “creative”. Everyone has some kind of “talent”, as if inside every child was a hidden seed of genius planted by one of the muses. Everyone wants a book deal. Everyone wants their shot on American Idol. Everyone wants to be “famous”, or at least “reknowned”.
As Julie puts it so well in Julie & Julia: “I could write a book. I have thoughts.”
Well, I’m not so sure. As Jay Z puts it in his song about coming to NYC to fulfill your dreams: “Too bad half of you won’t make it.” And half is a generous number, believe me.
Not everyone is Julia or Jay Z, or Elizabeth Gray, or Stephanie Meyer. Most of us will remain at the bottom of the slush pile. Most of us will be lucky if we ever finish the manuscript that is placed in the slush pile. There’s a reason so many talented people are drinkers or drug addicts, people. Trust me.
My husband, who is one of those talented writers with an MFA from NYU, asked himself – and me – a pertinent question the other day: “What is wrong with being mediocre?”
You see, we’re both terrified of just being “average” at the things we love. But in truth, most of us are only “average”, which is why it’s “average” in the first place. It’s coming to terms with that, and making peace with it, that becomes important.
I’m beginning to think that we live in a self-obsessed age. As Garrison Keillor playfully suggests, we live in a place “where all the women are strong, all the men are good-looking, and all the children are above average.” Or, at least, that is what we want to believe.
I fear that something about the rhetoric of being “the best” stops us from actually being able to take home the proverbial gold. I worry that our worship of the perfect makes us natural enemies of the “good enough”. And I wonder if all this obsession with our creativity and talent is at the expense of our more practical, and just as valuable, traits.
Any real writer will tell you, you don’t quit your day job to pursue writing. And if you do quit your day job, you certainly can’t complain about the lack of money, the stress, or the insecurities. Writers have piles and piles of rejection letters for every acceptance. And most writers – even the most successful – will give people the same advice: “If you can do anything else and be happy, for god’s sake, do it and do not become a writer.”
On Cougar Town – ABC’s new show
25 09 2009OK. I watched the debut of this show the other night, and I have to say that I, like Judith Warner at the NYTimes, disliked it. I thought the show itself was trying too hard and I found myself wondering if anyone who still looked as great as Courtney Cox over the age of 40 would really have as many insecurities and anxieties. I doubt it, but maybe I’m wrong.
Something the show did get right, I think, was the sense of loneliness that Cox’s character feels after she gets a divorce. That is all-too real for most women. There’s the sense of relief that you’re out of that dull or horrible marriage, to be sure, but then follows the crushing realization that you are no longer young and you are spending your nights alone with your book or the latest reality television show. Even a bad marriage insulates a woman from having to feel old and alone. So that hit the right note for me.
But, then, I just don’t believe that someone like Courtney would be alone for that long. Her odds are upped, aren’t they? What about the rest of us? With our sagging boobs and dimpled butts? If we have a scintillating personality or a fascinating life, then maybe we will do well on Match.com. But, if not? Ouch.
Perhaps one of the most disturbing things about the show was Christa Miller’s face. Is she in the running to become the new Joan Rivers? She used to be so cute on the Drew Carey show, back before all that face-saving surgery. Yikes.
If you watch the show, you’ll see what I mean. Her face barely moves and her lips are ridiculous.
This is exactly what I hope NOT to be like when I’m over 40. To my friends out there, if I go overboard someday on the silicone and botox, please set up an intervention and show me a tape of Christa Miller on Cougar Town. I’ll understand.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: aging, commentary, Cougar Town, cougars, over 40 women, women's issues
Categories : Uncategorized