I’m in the midst of reading Alain de Botton’s Essays in Love and just finished reading Love: A polemic. Reading each one has, in its own way, made me question the entire “culture of love” that exists. While reading, especially de Botton, I kept laughing out loud. And I was laughing out loud because the stories/anecdotes resonated with me. How there are predictable stages to things, how chimerical the object of one’s affection becomes, how (borrowing from de Botton’s words) we are all predisposed to love so that it comes as no surprise when we eventually discover an object for our desires.
I am cynic. And perhaps, as de Botton suggests, we tend to fall the hardest. Why? Because we want to suspend the disbelief, even momentarily. We want to put down the heavy burden of seeing through people and discovering the not-so-nice truths about them. That for brief spans, we are all willing to be blinded by love. Cynics the most of all.
I laugh because it’s true and I know it.
In my bedroom, appropriately enough under my bed, I keep a box with various scraps of mementos. High school yearbook, college diploma, my old baby book, cards from friends, photographs, trinkets, baubles, other things too precious to see or to use for fear of losing them. Occasionally, I sift through it and force myself to throw things out. I call it the purge session and it always makes me feel better.
On a recent go-through, I realized that I have at least one hand-written note from every significant lover or love I’ve ever had and the one thing that strikes me is that the word “love” is a very tricky thing. There it sits, neatly or haphazardly scrawled across the bottom of cards and notes, in some cases a full ten years after it was written. If something is true when written, and then fades like the ink it was written in, is it any less true ten years on? Somehow, does the word lose its meaning when we stop caring about those who wrote it and vice versa? Or, as Proust might suggest, do all of us still contain a version of the person still in love with a long-gone love of old? If a time/space continuum opened up right now and transported me back, I’m fairly certain that I would come face to face with my old self still madly in love with my first real boyfriend. Here’s my question, then – would the now version of me see all the flaws?
Would I scoff at myself? Try to tell myself how insane I was acting? How it was all going to end badly?
The truth of it is, and I’ve always known this about myself, I’m still half-in-love with all of those lovely boys and men I’ve ever loved. Partially because each one of them had something untouchable that made them unique and I got to know it and those things do not change over time. Partially, however, because I am still in love with the concept of love.
And aren’t we all?
Even in the midst of this breakdown of my marriage, with divorce getting closer on the horizon each passing day, I still have some sort of suicidal hope that I can find a meaningful connection. Why? I guess because I have come close before, which gives me hope that life is a neverending opportunity to get to know other human beings and just possibly find one that might love you back. In the meantime, I carry on.
But the raw truth is this: that a part of me has known that love is a mirage my entire life.
A part of me is like Estella in Dickens’ Great Expectations. For all the affection I have doled out, I don’t know if I’ve ever really been in love with someone before. I’ve come close, but I’ve never trusted anyone enough to let them hurt me. And I mean really hurt me. I’ve always been able to walk away, like Elizabeth Bishop (the poet) tells us – losing isn’t that hard an art to master.
And now?
I’m reading and writing poetry again. So what does that tell you?
Recent Comments